By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Helping the church get the Gospel message out to
the digital world depends more on a loving passion for reaching out to others than being tech savvy or a verbal warrior, Pope Francis told Catholic communicators.
"I believe that the goal is to understand how to enter into dialogue
with the men and women of today in order to appreciate their desires,
their doubts and their hopes," he said in his talk Sept. 21.
Despite the temptation that exists today, dialogue and bringing people
to Christ have nothing to do with hounding others into submission in a
kind of "theological brainwashing," he said.
The pope's
comments, which included a number of off-the-cuff remarks, came during a
special audience with participants of the Pontifical Council for Social
Communications' plenary assembly meeting Sept. 19-21 at the Vatican.
The discussions focused on the church and digital communication.
In a world of rapidly changing methods of communication, "the issues are not principally technological," the pope said.
He said it is important "to know how to dialogue and, with discernment,
to use modern technologies and social networks in such a way as to
reveal a presence that listens, converses and encourages."
Some
people "sometimes feel let down by a Christianity that to them appears
sterile and in difficulty as it tries to communicate the depth of
meaning that comes with the gift of faith," the pope said.
He emphasized that meeting Christ requires a personal encounter that cannot be forced or engineered.
"We have a great temptation in the church today" to engage in
"spiritual harassment, the manipulation of conscience, a theological
brainwashing," which, in the end, he said, only leads people to an
encounter with Christ in name only and not with the living person of the
Lord.
Meeting Christ involves the living Christ and the
individual experiencing the encounter, "not what's wanted by the
'spiritual engineer,' who wants to manipulate people," the pope said.
"Are we up to the task of bringing Christ into this area and of bringing others to meet Christ," he asked.
People are searching for the "precious treasure" of the Gospel, which
brings light and hope to a world that often lacks meaning, direction and
purpose, he said.
Communicators need to portray "the face of a
church, which is 'home' to all," and convey the beauty of faith and joy
of meeting Christ.
"The church must warm the hearts of men and
women. Do our presence and plans measure up to this requirement?" he
said, "or do we remain mired in technicalities?"
"Thorough and
adequate formation" is key, he said, because religious and lay Catholic
communicators need to be able to venture into the darkness of
indifference without losing their way; "to listen to (people's) dreams
without being seduced; to share their disappointments without becoming
despondent; to sympathize with those whose lives are falling apart
without losing our own strength and identity," he said.
In
fact, "we ourselves are means of communication," he said and "the real
problem does not concern the acquisition of the latest technologies,
even if these make a valid presence possible."
No matter how
outdated or inadequate the tools, God loves people so much that he
"wants to reveal himself through the means at our disposal, however poor
they are, because it is he who is at work, he who transforms and saves
us," he said.
The pope ended his talk by asking for people's
prayers "because I have this mission, too," of communicating Christ to
the world.
Toronto Cardinal Thomas Collins told Catholic News
Service that "in many ways we're made to be analog Christians in a
digital world."
The digital world is in many ways very
abstract, and it can be isolating and disorienting," he said. While it
has many benefits, people cannot forget that human beings are meant "to
be in relationship, personal relationship" with others.
Analog, he said, comes from "'analogy,' which means connectedness, relationship, and we always have to maintain that."
Christians need to keep real human connections and personal presence
alive "in the midst of a world which, if left to itself and its own
dynamics, will dry us out, make us abstract and disconnect us from one
another."
Basilian Father Thomas Rosica, CEO of Salt and Light
Television and adviser to the social communications' council, said the
pope "is the best example of what the new evangelization is all about."
The priest said the pope's success in making the media pay attention does not stem from studying communication theories.
"He didn't hire an ad company or a public relations firm, he is
communicating with his person, the credibility of his person, the
gestures, the desire to be with people," Father Rosica said.
The pope "has put a lot of us to shame because we can spin our theories,
but as long as we continue to do that without establishing human
relationships, all of our efforts are in vain," he said.
"What he's doing is he's touching the hearts of people, and the world has stopped and the world is listening," said the priest.
Greg Erlandson, president and publisher of Our Sunday Visitor
Publishing Division, said Catholic communicators can learn some lessons
from Pope Francis.
"We have to live the faith in a very
authentic way and a very physical way. We can't just write encyclicals
about it, we just can't issue documents about it," he said.
However, this personal approach is not new to Christianity, "it's really
the witness of the Gospel, the Acts of the Apostles, so maybe we have
to keep rediscovering this," he said.
END
Copyright (c) 2013 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Pope Benedict challenges atheist, says he never hid abuse cases
By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- In a letter to an atheist Italian mathematician, retired Pope Benedict XVI defended his own handling of allegations of the sexual abuse of minors by clergy and politely criticized the logician's total reliance on scientific facts for meaning.
"I never sought to conceal these things," the pope said of cases of clerical abuse, and lamented the scholar depicting the church as the only place where such "deviation" and "filth" occur.
The publication of the retired pope's comments Sept. 24 to an atheist scholar came the same month a written letter by Pope Francis to an Italian journalist concerning dialogue with nonbelievers was published. Both letters were published, with the two popes' permission, by the Italian daily La Repubblica.
The paper released long excerpts of Pope Benedict's original 11-page response to Piergiorgio Odifreddi, a prolific science writer who authored the book, "Dear Pope, I Write to You" in 2011. The book, presented as a letter to Pope Benedict, proposes the superiority of a worldview in which belief should stem only from things that can be understood and empirically known over worldviews that include belief in things that cannot be fully understood or known.
The pope's response, dated Aug. 30, thanked Odifreddi for seeking to juxtapose his ideas against the pope's own writings "and, thus, with my faith."
The pope, who has long engaged in dialogue with nonbelievers, most notably with his "Courtyard of the Gentiles" initiative and his 2011 Assisi gathering, said he appreciated Odifreddi's efforts to engage in a frank and open dialogue with the Catholic faith.
However, the pope said he met "with deep dismay" Odifreddi's unspecified comments about the clerical abuse scandals.
The pope, who was the first pontiff to meet with abuse victims, had spoken out forcefully against "the filth" in the church, clarified church laws to expedite cases, and mandated bishops' conferences put in place stringent norms against abuse, among a number of other initiatives.
In his letter, the pope said he never tried to cover up allegations.
"That the power of evil seeps all the way into the inner world of the faith is a source of suffering for us." Not only must the church bear the burden of this evil, but it also must "do everything possible so that such cases never repeat themselves," he wrote.
While there "is no reason to find solace in the fact that, according to research by sociologists, the percentage of priests guilty of these crimes is no higher than those present in other similar professional fields," neither should people "ostensibly present this deviation as if it were filth pertaining only to Catholicism," Pope Benedict wrote.
Just as it is wrong "to be silent about the evil in the church," it is wrong to remain silent about the good, holy and loving service the church has offered, he said.
Pope Benedict said he read Odifreddi's book "with pleasure and benefit."
However, he also offered some sharp criticisms against Odifreddi's arguments as well as his neglect of and lack of explanation for very real and observable phenomena such as love, liberty and evil.
The pope said it was curious that someone like Odifreddi, who considers theology to be nothing but "science fiction," would even consider the pope's works as "worthy of such a detailed discussion."
The retired pope said one of the things the two men have in common is a belief in a First Cause to the universe, only Odifreddi replaces God with "Nature" as the origin.
"But the question remains, who or what is this nature," the pope asked.
Nowhere does the scholar offer a definition, making "it appear, therefore, as an irrational divinity that explains nothing."
Concerning Odifreddi's "religion of mathematics," the pope said nowhere does this belief system consider three major human realities: "freedom, love and evil."
"I'm amazed that with just one stroke you eliminate freedom, which has existed and is the fundamental principle of the modern era."
"Whatever neurobiology says or doesn't say about freedom, this is present as a decisive reality in the actual unfolding of our history, and it must be taken into consideration."
Odifreddi's religion of mathematics also lacks any thought or discussion about love and evil, too, the pope said.
"A religion that neglects these fundamental questions remains empty," he said.
The pope, who has also long-supported the compatibility of faith and science as both being dedicated to the truth, underlined that the task of theology is to keep religion and reason closely connected.
One without the other will lead to certain dangerous "pathologies" in either religion or reason, he said.
Pope Benedict said science fiction exists in many areas of science, especially in some theories about the beginning and end of the world.
"I would define (Odifreddi's thoughts on this) as science fiction in the good sense of the word -- they are views and forecasts in order to reach real understanding, but they are, in fact, only (products of) imagination with which we try to get closer to reality."
The pope also gave Odifreddi some recommended readings to address the mathematician's doubts about being able to know anything for certain about the historical figure of Jesus.
Just because there is shoddy research out there "doesn't compromise the importance of serious historical research," which has brought real and certain knowledge about the figure of Jesus, the pope said.
He said "historical-critical exegesis is necessary for faith, which doesn't propose myths" out of historical figures and events, but demands a history that is based on truth and facts, and presents such findings with scientific rigor.
"All of my efforts have been aimed at showing how the Jesus described in the Gospels is also the real historical Jesus; that it is history that has really taken place," Pope Benedict said, referring to his writings on Jesus of Nazareth.
The pope ended his letter admitting he may have been harsh in some of his criticisms, but that "frankness is part of dialogue."
END
Copyright (c) 2013 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- In a letter to an atheist Italian mathematician, retired Pope Benedict XVI defended his own handling of allegations of the sexual abuse of minors by clergy and politely criticized the logician's total reliance on scientific facts for meaning.
"I never sought to conceal these things," the pope said of cases of clerical abuse, and lamented the scholar depicting the church as the only place where such "deviation" and "filth" occur.
The publication of the retired pope's comments Sept. 24 to an atheist scholar came the same month a written letter by Pope Francis to an Italian journalist concerning dialogue with nonbelievers was published. Both letters were published, with the two popes' permission, by the Italian daily La Repubblica.
The paper released long excerpts of Pope Benedict's original 11-page response to Piergiorgio Odifreddi, a prolific science writer who authored the book, "Dear Pope, I Write to You" in 2011. The book, presented as a letter to Pope Benedict, proposes the superiority of a worldview in which belief should stem only from things that can be understood and empirically known over worldviews that include belief in things that cannot be fully understood or known.
The pope's response, dated Aug. 30, thanked Odifreddi for seeking to juxtapose his ideas against the pope's own writings "and, thus, with my faith."
The pope, who has long engaged in dialogue with nonbelievers, most notably with his "Courtyard of the Gentiles" initiative and his 2011 Assisi gathering, said he appreciated Odifreddi's efforts to engage in a frank and open dialogue with the Catholic faith.
However, the pope said he met "with deep dismay" Odifreddi's unspecified comments about the clerical abuse scandals.
The pope, who was the first pontiff to meet with abuse victims, had spoken out forcefully against "the filth" in the church, clarified church laws to expedite cases, and mandated bishops' conferences put in place stringent norms against abuse, among a number of other initiatives.
In his letter, the pope said he never tried to cover up allegations.
"That the power of evil seeps all the way into the inner world of the faith is a source of suffering for us." Not only must the church bear the burden of this evil, but it also must "do everything possible so that such cases never repeat themselves," he wrote.
While there "is no reason to find solace in the fact that, according to research by sociologists, the percentage of priests guilty of these crimes is no higher than those present in other similar professional fields," neither should people "ostensibly present this deviation as if it were filth pertaining only to Catholicism," Pope Benedict wrote.
Just as it is wrong "to be silent about the evil in the church," it is wrong to remain silent about the good, holy and loving service the church has offered, he said.
Pope Benedict said he read Odifreddi's book "with pleasure and benefit."
However, he also offered some sharp criticisms against Odifreddi's arguments as well as his neglect of and lack of explanation for very real and observable phenomena such as love, liberty and evil.
The pope said it was curious that someone like Odifreddi, who considers theology to be nothing but "science fiction," would even consider the pope's works as "worthy of such a detailed discussion."
The retired pope said one of the things the two men have in common is a belief in a First Cause to the universe, only Odifreddi replaces God with "Nature" as the origin.
"But the question remains, who or what is this nature," the pope asked.
Nowhere does the scholar offer a definition, making "it appear, therefore, as an irrational divinity that explains nothing."
Concerning Odifreddi's "religion of mathematics," the pope said nowhere does this belief system consider three major human realities: "freedom, love and evil."
"I'm amazed that with just one stroke you eliminate freedom, which has existed and is the fundamental principle of the modern era."
"Whatever neurobiology says or doesn't say about freedom, this is present as a decisive reality in the actual unfolding of our history, and it must be taken into consideration."
Odifreddi's religion of mathematics also lacks any thought or discussion about love and evil, too, the pope said.
"A religion that neglects these fundamental questions remains empty," he said.
The pope, who has also long-supported the compatibility of faith and science as both being dedicated to the truth, underlined that the task of theology is to keep religion and reason closely connected.
One without the other will lead to certain dangerous "pathologies" in either religion or reason, he said.
Pope Benedict said science fiction exists in many areas of science, especially in some theories about the beginning and end of the world.
"I would define (Odifreddi's thoughts on this) as science fiction in the good sense of the word -- they are views and forecasts in order to reach real understanding, but they are, in fact, only (products of) imagination with which we try to get closer to reality."
The pope also gave Odifreddi some recommended readings to address the mathematician's doubts about being able to know anything for certain about the historical figure of Jesus.
Just because there is shoddy research out there "doesn't compromise the importance of serious historical research," which has brought real and certain knowledge about the figure of Jesus, the pope said.
He said "historical-critical exegesis is necessary for faith, which doesn't propose myths" out of historical figures and events, but demands a history that is based on truth and facts, and presents such findings with scientific rigor.
"All of my efforts have been aimed at showing how the Jesus described in the Gospels is also the real historical Jesus; that it is history that has really taken place," Pope Benedict said, referring to his writings on Jesus of Nazareth.
The pope ended his letter admitting he may have been harsh in some of his criticisms, but that "frankness is part of dialogue."
END
Copyright (c) 2013 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
About Scripture memorization....
Hey it's Don and Dawn here again.
There was once a restaurant that had a very peculiar promotion for their “All you can eat” buffet.
If you can eat in 30 minutes or less, you get a 50% discount on the final tab.
People rushed to the restaurant hoping to avail of such a treat.
You can see the place packed with people who rushed towards the food line, dumped the food on their plats, and ate like it was a marathon.
If you can eat in 30 minutes or less, you get a 50% discount on the final tab.
People rushed to the restaurant hoping to avail of such a treat.
You can see the place packed with people who rushed towards the food line, dumped the food on their plats, and ate like it was a marathon.
Most people finished eating in less than 30 minutes and only paid half the price.
A TV reported interview one of the patrons after he ate. He said that, as much as he paid half the price, he did not enjoy his meal because he was in a hurry.
A TV reported interview one of the patrons after he ate. He said that, as much as he paid half the price, he did not enjoy his meal because he was in a hurry.
He just stuffed everything in his mouth. He was too conscious of the clock rather than tasting the goodness of every bite.
Sometimes, that is how we treat reading the Bible.
We open up the book hoping to find an inspirational verse or two. Then, we’re off to our first appointment. We just read for the sake of reading. But did we enjoy it? No we didn’t.
Speed reading will not work with God’s Word. When reading the Bible, you need to take it slow. Take time to ponder what the verse is about. Memorize a verse and meditate it. Some even write in a journal.
All these cannot be rushed. If we seek God truthfully, then we need to honor Him with time.
David captures this thought in Psalm 63:1 (New International Version) - “You, God, are my God, earnestly I seek you; I thirst for you, my whole being longs for you, in a dry and parched land where there is no water.”
God offers an “All You Can Eat” buffet in the Bible. To truly enjoy it, you must take it slow, take pleasure in every bite, and leave satisfied.
Lastly, take God’s word with you by memorizing it.
Scripture memorization is a fun, fulfilling, and faith-building habit you can develop.
That’s why we’re encouraging to check out the resource we develop to help you memorize God’s word regardless of your age or situation.
Check it out here.
In Him,
Don and Dawn
P.S. Scripture memorization is a common habit by spirit filled Christians.
So don't let the enemy stop you and begin your journey today and…
Sometimes, that is how we treat reading the Bible.
We open up the book hoping to find an inspirational verse or two. Then, we’re off to our first appointment. We just read for the sake of reading. But did we enjoy it? No we didn’t.
Speed reading will not work with God’s Word. When reading the Bible, you need to take it slow. Take time to ponder what the verse is about. Memorize a verse and meditate it. Some even write in a journal.
All these cannot be rushed. If we seek God truthfully, then we need to honor Him with time.
David captures this thought in Psalm 63:1 (New International Version) - “You, God, are my God, earnestly I seek you; I thirst for you, my whole being longs for you, in a dry and parched land where there is no water.”
God offers an “All You Can Eat” buffet in the Bible. To truly enjoy it, you must take it slow, take pleasure in every bite, and leave satisfied.
Lastly, take God’s word with you by memorizing it.
Scripture memorization is a fun, fulfilling, and faith-building habit you can develop.
That’s why we’re encouraging to check out the resource we develop to help you memorize God’s word regardless of your age or situation.
Check it out here.
In Him,
Don and Dawn
P.S. Scripture memorization is a common habit by spirit filled Christians.
So don't let the enemy stop you and begin your journey today and…
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Writing from Left to Right: My Journey from Liberal to Conservative
by Michael Novak - published by Image Books Press, 2013
A Book Review by Father John McCloskey
At the ripe age of 80, Michael Novak has written a new book, Writing from Left to Right: My Journey from Liberal to Conservative.
Although the author probably would not agree, his book is both a memoir and a conversion story. In the decades ahead, it may rate a spot beside Thomas Merton's Seven Storey Mountain and Whittaker Chambers' Witness as capturing a certain political and spiritual moment in the United States.
Novak's era incorporates the last half of the 20th century and the early years of the new millennium.
As Novak puts it, "At eighty, I look back over the events I have witnessed, and I revisit the lessons I learned the hard way. Events and facts forced me to change my mind about ideas with which my education imbued me."
A little background for those who are not very familiar with him: Though not easy to categorize, Novak prefers to be described as "a social philosopher." What this means becomes clearer as you read the book. Since the '60s, he has played a prominent role in American political life, writing on everything from the ethics of the free market and welfare reform to the faith of the Founding Fathers. He has taught at Harvard and Stanford and held chairs at Syracuse, Notre Dame and, most significantly in recent decades, the American Enterprise Institute, a leading free-market think tank. In 1994, he received the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion.
To suggest the gamut of people he has known and worked with through the years, I culled this selection of names from the index:
Both Presidents Bush, President Jimmy Carter, President Bill Clinton (for whom he has some surprisingly kind words), Gov. Michael Dukakis, publisher Steve Forbes, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Czech politician Vaclav Havel, Sen. Scoop Jackson, President Lyndon Johnson, Rep. Jack Kemp, the three Kennedy brothers, Martin Luther King Jr., French philosopher Gabriel Marcel, Sen. Eugene McCarthy, President Richard Nixon, Gov. Edward Muskie, Father Richard John Neuhaus, politician pundit Norman Podhoretz, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, American ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and President Ronald Reagan.
However, this A-list roster does not make Novak an elitist. A native of Johnstown, Pa., he early identified himself as a proud ethnic (Slovak) Catholic Democrat — and retains all of those allegiances, except for the Democratic part.
I spoke earlier of Novak's gradual "conversions," which are somewhat related. His background and early years made him a union man, an ethnic Democrat in the Roosevelt/Truman mold. Through experience, observation and study, he came to adopt the conservative economics of the Austrian School of Friedrich von Hayek, perceiving that a free-growth economy benefited not only the entrepreneurs, but the general population, since, as the saying goes, "A rising wave lifts all boats." In the 1970s and '80s, he became an ardent supply-sider and Reaganaut, much to the surprise and, in some cases, anger of his Democratic liberal friends.
The second conversion, which he might not call by that name, was from National Catholic Reporter, Commonweal and America "Catholicism" to a more traditional understanding of the Second Vatican Council — personified by his fellow Slav, soon-to-be-canonized John Paul II. He recounts in detail his relationship with Pope John Paul in the final chapters of this stimulating book.
I heartily recommend this fine memoir of the religious, political and economic events of our era, concluding with a man who comprehended them all, John Paul the Great.
First appeared in The National Catholic Register, September 2013.
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Today's Mass Readings - Sunday, September 22, 2013 with Reflection
1ST READING - Amos 8:4-7
4 Hear this, you who trample upon the needy and destroy the poor of the land! 5 “When will the new moon be over,” you ask, “that we may sell our grain, and the sabbath, that we may display the wheat? We will diminish the ephah, add to the shekel, and fix our scales for cheating! 6 We will buy the lowly man for silver, and the poor man for a pair of sandals; even the refuse of the wheat we will sell!” 7 The Lord has sworn by the pride of Jacob: Never will I forget a thing they have done!
P S A L M - Psalm 113:1-2, 4-6, 7-8
R: Praise the Lord who lifts up the poor.
1 Praise, you servants of the Lord, praise the name of the Lord. 2 Blessed be the name of the Lord both now and forever. (R) 4 High above all nations is the Lord; above the heavens is his glory. 5 Who is like the Lord, our God, who is enthroned on high 6 and looks upon the heavens and the earth below? (R) 7 He raises up the lowly from the dust; from the dunghill he lifts up the poor 8 to seat them with princes, with the princes of his own people. (R)
2ND READING - 1 Timothy 2:1-8
1 Beloved: First of all, then, I ask that supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings be offered for everyone, 2 for kings and for all in authority, that we may lead a quiet and tranquil life in all devotion and dignity. 3 This is good and pleasing to God our savior, 4 who wills everyone to be saved and to come to knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God. There is also one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as ransom for all. This was the testimony at the proper time. 7 For this I was appointed preacher and apostle —I am speaking the truth, I am not lying — teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth. 8 It is my wish, then, that in every place the men should pray, lifting up holy hands, without anger or argument.
GOSPEL ACCLAMATION
Though our Lord Jesus Christ was rich, he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich.
Luke 16:1-13
1 Jesus said to his disciples, “A rich man had a steward who was reported to him for squandering his property. 2 He summoned him and said, ‘What is this I hear about you? Prepare a full account of your stewardship, because you can no longer be my steward.’ 3 The steward said to himself, ‘What shall I do, now that my master is taking the position of steward away from me? I am not strong enough to dig and I am ashamed to beg. 4 I know what I shall do so that, when I am removed from the stewardship, they may welcome me into their homes.’ 5 He called in his master’s debtors one by one. To the first he said, ‘How much do you owe my master?’6 He replied, ‘One hundred measures of olive oil.’ He said to him, ‘Here is your promissory note. Sit down and quicklywrite one for fifty.’ 7 Then to another the steward said, ‘And you, how much do you owe?’ He replied, ‘One hundred kors of wheat.’ The steward said to him, ‘Here is your promissory note; write one for eighty.’ 8 And the master commended that dishonest steward for acting prudently. “For the children of this world are more prudent in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light. 9 I tell you, make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, so that when it fails, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings. 10 The person who is trustworthy in very small matters is also trustworthy in great ones; and the person who is dishonest in very small matters is also dishonest in great ones. 11 If, therefore, you are not trustworthy with dishonest wealth, who will trust you with true wealth? 12 If you are not trustworthy with what belongs to another, who will give you what is yours? 13 No servant can serve two masters. He will either hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.”
| SABBATH | ||
SINGLEHEARTED SERVICE
St. Francis, a privileged son of a wealthy merchant, Pietro Bernardone, was a happy-go-lucky young man who, together with his friends, spent boisterous nights of drinking and fun in ancient Assisi. Until, as a knight, he saw the horrors of war. Upon his conversion, he decided to give and throw away to an excited mob of poor people the expensive textiles his father was selling. He left the Bernardone household, recognizing God as his only Father. He and his eventual followers decided to embrace Lady Poverty.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, “A theory that makes profit the exclusive norm and ultimate end of economic activity is morally unacceptable. It is one of the causes of the many conflicts which disturb the social order.” Furthermore, “a system that subordinates the basic rights of individuals and of groups to collective organization of production is contrary to human dignity. Every practice that reduces persons to nothing more than a means of profit enslaves man, leads to idolizing money, and contributes to the spread of atheism” (CCC no. 2424).
You cannot serve both God and mammon. Many relationships have been adversely affected by money. Friends and families have been divided because of worldly cares. Even siblings have come into conflict against each other because of how their parents’ wealth should be divided.
I once told my parents, “Tatay, Nanay, thank you for teaching us, your children, to love one another and avoid having quarrels. We assure you that we, your children, will never go against one another just because of our parents’ riches and money — because we have nothing to quarrel about.”
While we can use money to a good end, like serving God, our hearts should never be divided between God and money. The end should always be for the common good, for a better life and a more solid relationship with God. Money is temporary. God is forever. And we’re bound to love and serve only that which will never end. Fr. Erick Y. Santos, OFS
REFLECTION QUESTION: How do you deal with money and how important is it to you?
Lord, allow me to see You more clearly, follow You more nearly, and love You more dearly. Amen.
St. Lawrence Ruiz and Companions, pray for us.
Do you want to receive this in your email. To get Bo Sanchez to send it to you personally, register and log-on to http://kerygmafamily.com.
Lots of surprises await.
|
Friday, September 20, 2013
The conversion of a hateful Englishman
| ||
|
Sunday, September 15, 2013
Today's Mass Readings - Sunday, September 15, 2013
1ST READING - Exodus 32:7-11, 13-14
7 The Lord said to Moses, “Go down at once to your people, whom you brought out of the land of Egypt, for they have become depraved. 8 They have soon turned aside from the way I pointed out to them, making for themselves
a molten calf and worshipping it, sacrificing to it and crying out,
‘This is your God, O Israel, who brought you out of the land of Egypt!’ 9 I
see how stiff-necked this people is,” continued the Lord to Moses. 10 “Let me alone, then, that my wrath may blaze up against them to consume them. Then I will make of you a great nation.” 11 But Moses implored the Lord, his God, saying, “Why, O Lord, should your wrath blaze up against your own people, whom you brought out of the land of Egypt with such great power and with so strong a hand? 13 Remember your servants Abraham, Isaac and Israel, and how you swore to
them by your own self, saying, ‘I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky; and all this land that I promised, I will give your descendants as their perpetual heritage.’” 14 So the Lord relented in the punishment he had threatened to inflict on his people.
P S A L M - Psalm 51:3-4, 12-13, 17, 19
R: I will rise and go to my father.
1 [3] Have mercy on me, O God, in your goodness; in the greatness of your compassion wipe out my offense. 2 [4] Thoroughly wash me from my guilt and of my sin cleanse me. (R) 10 [12] A clean heart create for me, O God, and a steadfast spirit renew within me. 11 [13] Cast me not out from your
presence, and your Holy Spirit take not from me. (R) 15 [17] O Lord, open my lips, and my mouth shall proclaim your praise. 17 [19] My sacrifice, O God, is a contrite spirit; a heart contrite and humbled, O God, you will not spurn. (R)
2nd READING - 1 Timothy 1:12-17
12 Beloved:
I am grateful to him who has strengthened me, Christ Jesus our Lord,
because he considered me trustworthy in appointing me to the ministry. 13 I
was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and an arrogant man, but I have
been mercifully treated because I acted out of ignorance in my unbelief.
14 Indeed, the grace of our Lord has been abundant, along with the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus. 15 This
saying
is trustworthy and deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the
world to save sinners. Of these I am the foremost. 16 But
for that reason I was mercifully treated, so that in me, as the
foremost, Christ Jesus might display all his patience as an example for
those who would come to believe in him for everlasting life. 17 To the king of ages, incorruptible, invisible, the only God, honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.
GOSPEL ACCLAMATION
God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation.
Luke 15:1-32
1 Tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to listen to Jesus, 2 but the Pharisees and scribes began to complain, saying, “This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.” 3 So to them he addressed this parable. 4 “What
man among you having a hundred sheep and losing one of them would not
leave the ninety-nine in the desert and go after the lost one until
he finds it? 5 And when he does find it, he sets it on his shoulders with great joy 6 and,
upon his arrival home, he calls together his friends and neighbors and
says to them, ‘Rejoice with me because I have found my lost sheep.’ 7 I
tell you, in just the same way there will be more joy in heaven over
one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who have
no need of repentance. 8 Or what woman having ten coins and losing
one would not light a lamp and sweep the house, searching carefully until she finds it? 9 And when she does find it, she calls together her friends and neighbors and says to them, ‘Rejoice with me because I have found the coin that I lost.’ 10 In just the same way, I tell you, there will be rejoicing among the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” 11 Then he said, “A man had two sons, 12 and
the younger son said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of your
estate that should come to me.’ So the father divided the property
between them. 13 After a
few days, the younger son collected all his belongings and set off to a
distant country where he squandered his inheritance on a life of
dissipation. 14 When he had freely spent everything, a severe famine struck that country, and he found himself in dire need. 15 So he hired himself out to one of the local citizens who sent him to his farm to tend the swine. 16 And he longed to eat his fill of the pods on which the swine fed, but nobody gave him any. 17 Coming
to his senses he thought, ‘How many of my father’s hired workers have
more than enough food to eat, but here am I, dying from hunger. 18 I shall get up and go to my father
and I shall say to him, Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. 19 I no longer deserve to be called your son; treat me as you would treat one of your hired workers.’ 20 So he got up and went back to his father. While he was still a long way off, his father caught sight of him, and was filled with compassion. He ran to his son, embraced him and kissed him. 21 His son said
to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you; I no longer deserve to be called your son.’ 22 But his father ordered his servants, ‘Quickly bring the finest robe and put it on him; put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. 23 Take the fattened calf and slaughter it. Then let us celebrate with a feast, 24 because this son of mine was dead, and has come to life again; he was lost, and has been found.’ Then the celebration began. 25
Now the older son had been out in the field and, on his way back, as he neared the house, he heard the sound of music and dancing. 26 He called one of the servants and asked what this might mean. 27 The
servant said to him, ‘Your brother has returned and your father has
slaughtered the fattened calf because he has him back safe and sound.’ 28 He became angry, and when he refused
to enter the house, his father came out and pleaded with him. 29 He said to his father in reply, ‘Look, all these years I served you and not once did I disobey your orders; yet you never gave me even a young goat to feast on with my friends. 30 But when your son returns who swallowed up your property with prostitutes, for him you slaughter the fattened calf.’ 31 He said to him,
‘My son, you are here with me always; everything I have is yours. 32 But now we must celebrate and rejoice, because your brother was dead and has come to life again; he was lost and has been found.’”
| SABBATH | ||
NOT GIVING UP ON THE ONE YOU LOVE
There was a competition among the angels in heaven. They were to look for the
most beautiful thing they could find on earth. So they all went off and
flew down. The first one saw a beautiful flower and picked it. The
second angel went to a house where a
baby was sleeping. Such innocence melted the heart of the angel. The
third angel lost his way and found himself in a beer house where
beautiful ladies were dancing. He was amazed, without a trace of malice,
at the women’s beauty. Finally, the fourth angel went to my former
parish to look for me. He wasn’t lucky enough though. I was not there.
He
proceeded to the church and saw somebody kneeling before the Blessed
Sacrament. He was a most hardened sinner wanting to be reconciled with
the Lord. In deep despair and sorrow for his sins, he cried unabashedly.
The angel, on cue, caught the crystalline tears coming from the eyes of
the repentant sinner. All four angels then brought their “beautiful
discoveries” to heaven for final judging. The fourth angel won the competition, for nothing can be more beautiful than the tears of a repentant sinner.
The Lord who came to cure the sick considers the return of a lost son
as a cause for rejoicing. He never gets tired of looking for wounded
souls.
The father of the prodigal son never lost hope. After his son left and
squandered all his inheritance, he never stopped waiting for his return.
He hoped against hope that one day his son would return home. Because
he was his son whom he loved unconditionally, he never gave up on him,
gave him a new lease in life, and restored him to his dignity as his
son.
God’s love is total and unconditional. He does not postpone His
forgiveness. Even Paul in the Second Reading admits that he “was once a
blasphemer, persecutor and arrogant. But he has mercifully treated me.”
God did not give up on Paul. And as cliché as it may sound, God loves
us. He does not give up on us, lowly sinners. Fr. Erick Y. Santos, OFS
REFLECTION QUESTION: What keeps you from going back to God now? Try Him. He will not turn His back on you.
Lord, in shame, I thank You for bearing with me and loving me unconditionally.
Our Lady of Sorrows, pray for us.
Do you want to receive this in your email. To get Bo Sanchez to send it to you personally, register and log-on to http://kerygmafamily.com.
Lots of surprises await.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



